Blackhawks shocked as Rangers sweep.
GAME 2
Get the Duck Sauce ready !!!
There would be no need for a game 3 in this series, as the Rangers trounced the Blackhawks, 7-1.
How does the first place team only score two goals in two playoff games? And give up 11 goals ?
"It's all the Black Mask's fault," said the Komodo Dragon. "Players can finally see how tall Ben really is, the white mask was better optical illusion or net camo."
Which player on the Rangers anonymously posted these comments throughout the season?
(Jan 18, 2013) Trade Rumors said: Let's just be very clear. The Rangers aren't as good as their 3-0-1 record might suggest. so let's squash any trade rumors before they even get started.
(Feb 15, 2013) BBHC Bylaws said: The intent of the board is, and always has been, to develop 4 competitive teams and keep the league a fun place to enjoy the sport. Teams are developed each session with parity as the most important factor.
(Feb 25, 2013) Pierre in the Glass said: When is the time that trades are made in this league? You have an undefeated team that is winning it's games by 3 goals on average, and then there isn't 1 other team that is over .500 or has a + goals differential. If now isn't the time, then when exactly is the time? When one team is winning by 4 goals a game?
(Feb 28, 2013) historian said: Like most of the time over the last few years and for some strange reason it is always the same guy's team with the 10-2 record...even last season when the teams ended with similar records, it was obvious who would play in the finals. Only team in the league to be in first, lose a guy and improve.
That about says it all. A big choke by the first place team. Speed was beside himself, and calling to himself for a pass. Murf was on time. Ditto for Uretsky. Tripp drove thru snow to get to the game. And Honest Mike Raimo lied about something. Yeah, I'd say things just didn't fall into place for the first place team.
GAME 3 - not needed
Get the Duck Sauce ready !!!
There would be no need for a game 3 in this series, as the Rangers trounced the Blackhawks, 7-1.
How does the first place team only score two goals in two playoff games? And give up 11 goals ?
"It's all the Black Mask's fault," said the Komodo Dragon. "Players can finally see how tall Ben really is, the white mask was better optical illusion or net camo."
Which player on the Rangers anonymously posted these comments throughout the season?
(Jan 18, 2013) Trade Rumors said: Let's just be very clear. The Rangers aren't as good as their 3-0-1 record might suggest. so let's squash any trade rumors before they even get started.
(Feb 15, 2013) BBHC Bylaws said: The intent of the board is, and always has been, to develop 4 competitive teams and keep the league a fun place to enjoy the sport. Teams are developed each session with parity as the most important factor.
(Feb 25, 2013) Pierre in the Glass said: When is the time that trades are made in this league? You have an undefeated team that is winning it's games by 3 goals on average, and then there isn't 1 other team that is over .500 or has a + goals differential. If now isn't the time, then when exactly is the time? When one team is winning by 4 goals a game?
(Feb 28, 2013) historian said: Like most of the time over the last few years and for some strange reason it is always the same guy's team with the 10-2 record...even last season when the teams ended with similar records, it was obvious who would play in the finals. Only team in the league to be in first, lose a guy and improve.
That about says it all. A big choke by the first place team. Speed was beside himself, and calling to himself for a pass. Murf was on time. Ditto for Uretsky. Tripp drove thru snow to get to the game. And Honest Mike Raimo lied about something. Yeah, I'd say things just didn't fall into place for the first place team.
GAME 3 - not needed
